نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانشیار گروه فلسفه، دانشگاه مفید، قم، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
This article is the answer to the question: What path has Islamic philosophy taken in the face of polemical issues? The importance of this question and the need to address it becomes clearer when the bilateral polemical issues are considered as the reason for the inability and impermissibility of the nature of intellect in the cognitive transition beyond nature. In Western philosophy, this was done by Kant, and the light of metaphysical knowledge or the first philosophy was reduced to extinction. Islamic philosophy, like all other philosophies that have sought to discover supernatural beings, their rules and effects, is confronted with a philosophy that, based on its system, lowers the mentioned concepts from their cognitive level. Thus, based on the position of bilateral polemical issues in Kant's critical philosophy, this article recounts the encounters of Islamic philosophers with such issues to finally explain why what became part of Kant's reason for rejecting the cognitive nature of metaphysical knowledge did not happen in Islamic philosophy. Philosophers of Islamic philosophy, unlike Kant, did not attribute the bilateral polemical issues of this knowledge to the nature of intellect.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)